DIMAPUR, April 9: The Janata Dal (United) Nagaland State Unit has voiced strong opposition and “deep concern” over the Government of India’s recent decision to erect fencing along the Indo-Myanmar border and terminate the Free Movement Regime (FMR). The FMR has historically enabled cross-border interaction among ethnic communities sharing deep cultural, familial, and traditional ties across the two nations.
In an official statement, the JDU Nagaland emphasized that the decision—“reportedly driven by security considerations in certain border regions”—was made unilaterally and “without prior consultation with affected stakeholders, including the people of Nagaland and neighbouring northeastern states.”
The party underlined that the FMR was originally established to “honour the historical interconnectedness of communities divided by colonial-era borders.” It further noted that the regime has been “vital in fostering cultural exchange, economic collaboration, and regional harmony.” The JDU cautioned that its termination “risks disrupting centuries-old ties between indigenous tribes of the Eastern Nagas, who reside on both sides of the border.”
Strongly criticizing the move, the party asserted, “The move to fence the border and end the FMR overlooks the unique socio-political context of the region and risks exacerbating tensions by further estranging communities already affected by the artificial division of ancestral lands.”
The JDU Nagaland also expressed disappointment over the “lack of transparency in the decision-making process,” pointing out that it “excluded meaningful dialogue with state governments, civil society, and local leaders.” It warned that this “top-down approach undermines the spirit of cooperative federalism and risks increasing distrust among border communities.”
The party further cautioned that “ignoring local perspectives could lead to social unrest and create long-term challenges for families and traders dependent on cross-border connections.”
Calling for a reversal or reevaluation of the decision, the JDU Nagaland said, “This decision poses a direct challenge to our shared heritage and identity. Instead of constructing physical barriers, we urge the Central Government to engage in open dialogue with all stakeholders, including Myanmar, to address security concerns while preserving the rights and livelihoods of our people.”
As a constructive alternative, the party recommended exploring “regulated movement, advanced monitoring systems, and community-inclusive border management” as potentially more effective and balanced approaches.
In conclusion, the Janata Dal (United) Nagaland respectfully urged the Government of India to reconsider its decision and initiate inclusive dialogues. The party stressed that such steps are crucial to safeguarding both national security and the region’s unique socio-cultural fabric.
